Home

Articles

Get our Free
Newsletter!

Vote in our Opinion Polls

Tell a Friend!

Contact us

Investors in CLP have voted by more than 3 to 2 against the issue mandate - so chalk that up as another bite for Project Vampire.

Vampire bites CLP
23rd April 2004

Investors made their views clear at the AGM of CLP Holdings Ltd (CLP, 0002) yesterday. According to the shareholder circular, the controlling shareholders, being the Kadoorie family and related parties, have a total holding of 839,028,074 shares, or 34.84% of the company. We'll ignore the votes of other directors, although they probably also voted in favour of giving themselves a mandate to issue new shares.

Deducting the controlling stake from the official poll results, the investing public voted as follows:

  Votes Share
In favour 157,788,719 39.87%
Against 238,008,309 60.13%
Total 395,797,028 100.00%

Voting turnout was about 25.22% of the non-controlling shares. The investor vote of more than 3 to 2 against the general mandate sends a clear message to CLP, if they are listening - next year, lower your cash issue mandate to comply with international best practice, in line with the recommendations of Project Vampire.

© Webb-site.com, 2004


Sign up for our free newsletter

Recommend Webb-site.com to a friend

Important notice: All material on this site, except where otherwise accredited, is copyright to Webb-site.com. Media and researchers are welcome to quote from articles on this site, provided that such quotation is attributed to Webb-site.com. The information in this site should not be relied upon by any person in making any investment decision. No responsibility or liability is accepted by Webb-site.com or any person related to it for any loss arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this site. Persons who are in any doubt about an investment or potential investment should take professional investment advice. From time to time parties associated with Webb-site.com may own long or short positions in securities issued by or related to companies or governments on which we comment.

Back to top