Dickson Concepts has
breached the SEHK listing rules with a transaction in which the Chairman's
private company will receive HK$130m. Not for the first time, the company
finds itself under a cloud of poor corporate governance. |
Clicks & Tricks
6th July 2000
Dickson
Concepts (International) Ltd (DCI), chaired by flamboyant retailer
Dickson Poon, has breached the Stock Exchange listing rules.
In a transaction disclosed for the first time today, it emerges
that back on 30-Dec-99, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DCI entered into a
"Consultancy and Professional Services Agreement" with Dickson
Management Consultancy Ltd (DMC) in respect of the establishment and
development of a department store (sorry, "physical mall") and a web
site (sorry, "cyber mall"). DMC is wholly-owned by Dickson Poon,
the Chairman of DCI.
The agreement requires a fixed consultancy fee of HK$130m
to DMC. This is purportedly
"on a cost reimbursement basis, this fixed amount being
equal to the parties' pre-estimate of the cost to DMC of providing the
relevant services."
We are left to guess as to what those costs are - do they, for
example, include a payment for the services of Mr Poon? If this fee were really
a cost reimbursement, then surely it would be based on actual costs incurred and
not a lump sum. The announcement was silent on whether this amount has already
been paid.
The board of DCI (which has 2 independent directors) claims to
have believed that pursuant to (unspecified) exemptions in Chapter 14 of the
listing rules, the agreement was not subject to disclosure or approval by
independent shareholders. Common sense tells you otherwise - there is a clear
conflict of interest here involving a material amount of money. The SEHK agrees
and has ruled that the transaction was not exempt.
Independent shareholders will now be asked to ratify the
transaction, and no doubt a scribe will be wheeled out to say that it was all
fair and reasonable. We demand full disclosure of what these alleged costs
incurred by DMC relate to, including any amounts payable to connected parties of
DCI, and any amounts subcontracted to outside developers.
We also want to hear why shareholders of DCI should pay for
retail expertise from a consultancy company owned by its Chairman, when DCI is
supposed to already possess retail expertise and could have contracted third
parties for any aspects of the web site which were beyond its competence. At
least part of the services are for setting up a department store (above the new
Kowloon MTR station), something which DCI has done many times before.
Then, as a matter of principle, independent shareholders
should vote against the transaction and refuse to ratify it, because the company
failed to seek their consent in the first place. Rejection of the agreement will
not unwind it, but it will send a message that this kind of behaviour is
intolerable.
We note that the Agreement also requires DCI to buy HK$110m of
hardware and software recommended by DMC for the project, from DMC's recommended
suppliers. DMC will receive no commission on these purchases. The combined total
of HK$240m is exactly what DCI has already recorded as "Website/portal
development costs" in its results for the year ended 31-Mar-00.
Option Schemes are Next
At the same time, shareholders will be asked to approve the
spin-off of Dickson Cyber Concepts Ltd on GEM, and to approve separately pre-IPO
and post-IPO share option schemes for Dickson Cyber. Shareholders should think
twice if any of these options will be granted to Mr Poon or other directors of
DCI. Any such options should be itemised in advance of the vote.
Weak Corporate Governance
DCI has a history of poor corporate governance - last year observers
raised questions over the sale of the company's non-Asian retail
assets (including Harvey Nichols and S.T. Dupont) to Mr Poon, a transaction
which received independent shareholders' approval and was partly paid for by a
dividend of the sale proceeds from DCI. The 1999 annual directors' report of DCI
is riddled with a list of connected transactions which goes on for 2 pages.
In relation to the breach of the listing rules by DCI in its
deal with DCM, the Stock Exchange "has indicated that it reserves the right
to take appropriate action against DCI". Such as listing Dickson Cyber on
GEM, perhaps. That'll teach them.
We've seen those words printed so many times that the SEHK must
have a special rubber stamp which bears them. They said the same thing about Van
Shung Chong and iSteelAsia.com.
And what about DCI's so-called independent directors? Well, they
are Mr Karl Scheufele and his son, Karl Friederich Scheufele. Karl senior is the
owner and President of Chopard
of Geneva, a manufacturer of luxury watches and jewellery which is a supplier to
DCI's stores.
It is safe to say that these gentlemen are probably not leading
experts on the listing rules. If Hong Kong's listing rules required real
independent directors, chosen and appointed only by public shareholders rather
than by controlling shareholders, then transactions such as this would be much
rarer.
© Webb-site.com, 2000
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site.com to a friend
Important notice: All material on this site, except
where otherwise accredited, is copyright to Webb-site.com.
Media and researchers are welcome to quote from articles on this site, provided that such
quotation is attributed to Webb-site.com. The
information in this site should not be relied upon by any person in making any investment
decision. No responsibility or liability is accepted by Webb-site.com or any person
related to it for any loss arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the
contents of this site. Persons who are in any doubt about an investment or potential
investment should take professional investment advice. From time to time parties associated with Webb-site.com may
own long or short positions in securities issued by or related to companies or governments
on which we comment.
Back to top
|