It's not often we can give you good news, so here's something to warm the proxies of your heart. A month ago, we warned that H-share China Oilfield Services Ltd (COS, 2883) was proposing to renew and expand a mandate to lend money to CNOOC Finance Corporation Ltd (CNOOCF), a subsidiary of state-owned parent China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC). We urged investors to vote against the proposal, because it is bad governance for a listed company to lend money to its controlling shareholders. It's your money, not theirs. The vote was originally scheduled for 5-Nov-04, leaving a very short timetable in which to vote, but thanks to PRC regulations, the meeting was adjourned on the grounds that only 32.41% of the shares eligible to vote at the meeting were represented, falling short of the initial quorum of 50% of the eligible shares. In an adjourned meeting, no such quorum applies. In Apr-04, CNOOC's other listed subsidiary, CNOOC Ltd (CNOOCL, 0833), sought and obtained a 3-year mandate to do the same thing, in a rushed meeting timetable in which many investors, including some ADR holders, had no time to react and turnout was only 21.9%. CNOOCL is incorporated in Hong Kong and so does not have to follow the same quorum rules as PRC-incorporated COS. PR battlePrior to the original meeting, COS had engaged in some aggressive public relations in which it claimed to media that the risk of depositing money with CNOOC Finance is not greater than putting money in "any other bank". After we pointed out that CNOOC Finance was not a bank, on 1-Nov-04 they issued an announcement which corrected that but then said:
Students of finance will spot the error in that statement - credit ratings are given to individual companies, not to whole groups. A subsidiary of a company may be highly geared and not credit worthy, but the parent can still be triple-A rated. That is due to the legal concept of limited liability - the debts of a company are not the debts of its parent. We checked with the agencies and sure enough, CNOOCF has no credit rating. But if you read the announcement, it carries the clear and misleading implication that CNOOCF is rated BBB+. So we complained again, and then on 4-Nov-04 we get another announcement which says:
The meeting was adjourned the following day. On 9-Nov-04, COS published a revised proxy form in which it unbundled the proposed connected transactions, as we had urged them to do. So now, instead of a single resolution covering all the connected transactions with CNOOC group, there were 6 different resolutions, the first 5 of which relate to necessary transactions for COS to carry out its ordinary business and the last one relating to the loans to CNOOCF, or as the company called it, "depositary services". The meeting took place on 29-Nov-04, and as you can see from the official results, the proposal relating to the loans to the parent group was defeated by 62.92% to 37.08%. The turnout at the meeting was 34.74% of eligible shares. The messageThere are several points that come out of this:
Copyright Webb-site.com, 2004 Sign up for our free newsletter Recommend Webb-site.com to a friend Important notice: All material on this site, except where otherwise accredited, is copyright to Webb-site.com. Media and researchers are welcome to quote from articles on this site, provided that such quotation is attributed to Webb-site.com. The information in this site should not be relied upon by any person in making any investment decision. No responsibility or liability is accepted by Webb-site.com or any person related to it for any loss arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this site. Persons who are in any doubt about an investment or potential investment should take professional investment advice. From time to time parties associated with Webb-site.com may own long or short positions in securities issued by or related to companies or governments on which we comment. |