In all the froth surrounding SABMiller's unsolicited bid for
Harbin Brewery, media have overlooked the management's possible HK$110m payout
under put-options from SABMiller triggered by the offer, and the $131m profit
by the unknown parties who have flipped an option to Anheuser-Busch. |
Harbin Secrets
6th
May 2004
Hong Kong may or may not be on the brink of its first major
contested takeover in years - the last one we can recall was a brief tussle in
2000 between Singapore Telecom and PCCW over Hong Kong Telecom, but that doesn't
really count given that Cable & Wireless had majority control of HKT.
Yesterday
SABMiller plc (SABMiller), which controls 295m shares (29.42%) of
Harbin Brewery Group Ltd (HB),
announced a $4.30 per share bid for the company, or 36.7x last year's EPS.
We haven't seen such a generous offer since DBS Bank forked out for Dao Heng.
Yesterday's bid was a swift reaction to an
announcement that
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (A-B) had conditionally acquired
291.5m shares (29.07%) stake at $3.70 per share.
The Real Deal
In fact, it's not that simple. That's just the version you read
in the press, so let's dig a little deeper. Back on 22-Mar-04, HB
announced that a BVI company called Global Conduit Holdings Ltd (Global
Conduit) had conditionally agreed to buy the same block of 291.5m shares at
$3.25 per share from another BVI company controlled by the Harbin Municipal
Government. The owners of Global Conduit were not disclosed, but it said that
nobody owned more than a 20% voting interest in the shell.
It turns out that all the shares of Global Conduit were held by
another BVI company, Capital Select Enterprises Ltd (Capital Select), the
owners of which are unknown. This manoeuvre avoided disclosing the beneficial
owners of Global Conduit when it was sold. Then on or before 2-May-04, without
ever putting up the money to actually complete the purchase of the HB stake,
Global Conduit was conditionally sold by Capital Select to A-B. The HB
announcement of 4-May-04 says that the "effective transfer price" is $3.70
per HB share. But, you will note that A-B has not actually acquired the HB
shares, just "the right of Global Conduit to complete the purchase".
It appears that whoever owns Capital Select have managed to make
a profit of $0.45 per share, or a total of $131.2m, without every putting
up the purchase money. That's not small beer! The purchase by Global Conduit
from the Harbin Government remains subject to approval by "the relevant PRC
authorities" and the issue of a legal opinion by the Government-owned vendor
of the validity of the transfer. It is not known whether A-B's purchase of
Global Conduit was conditional on these same approvals, or whether A-B has taken
over the risk of the deal failing.
It remains to be seen whether the Government will grant all the
necessary approvals, given that SABMiller now has an offer on the table at $4.30
per share, a 32.3% premium to the conditional sale price of $3.25 to Global
Conduit. If Harbin Government can find a way to get out of the sale to Global
Conduit, then they would be crazy not to use it and collect $4.30 instead, an
extra $306m.
We call on HB to disclose full details of the beneficial
owners of Capital Select and Global Conduit and the conditions of the purchase
of Global Conduit by A-B. The only things that we know so far are based on
filings under the SFO, which
show that Philip Kan Sung Chee (Mr Kan) owned 20% of Global Conduit.
Mr Kan is a
partner of law firms Lo &
Lo and its joint venture with UK firm
Stephenson Harwood,
Stephenson Harwood & Lo.
The filings also
show that a Mr David Lee Sun (Mr Sun) is a director of Capital Select
and that both Mr Sun and Mr Kan are directors of Global Conduit. We know nothing
else about Mr Sun.
Management's Pay-out
Back on 27-Jun-03, when SABMiller
agreed to invest in HB, it set up a 95% subsidiary, Gardwell Ltd (Gardwell)
to hold the shares. The purchase price was $2.29 per HB share, for a total of
$675.6m. The vendor was an obscure Dublin-listed fund called China Enterprise
Development Fund Ltd, major shareholders of which at the time of the HB IPO were
University of Richmond,
Fidelity and the manager
of the fund. We could not find any trace of the fund last night on the
Irish Stock Exchange web site - apparently it has been delisted.
Gardwell was structured like a leveraged Management Buy-Out
(MBO) vehicle, with just $100m of equity, of which SABMiller put in $95m and $5m
was subscribed by Advent Strategic Ltd (Advent), another BVI company
owned by 5 directors and the CFO of HB. Presumably the remaining $575.6m was
debt finance, perhaps funded by SABMiller.
As a performance incentive for management, SABMiller granted
Advent put options, that is, the right to sell the 5% Gardwell stake back to
SABMiller in tranches of 2.28% and 2.72% between the 1st and 3rd anniversary of
the deal, for a total of $55m, "subject to certain performance
criteria (i.e. the share price performance of [HB]". It is not known what
share price targets were set. Now here's the punch:
"The exercise of the Put Options will be accelerated and, in
certain circumstances, the consideration increased by 100% if: (i)
SABMiller...announces a firm intention to make a general offer for the shares in
[HB]..."
We don't know what the "certain circumstances" are, but
now that SABMiller has indeed announced a general offer for the shares in HB, it
appears that the Put Option has become exercisable, and management gets a
pay-out of up to $110m (being a 100% increase over the $55m). That's a
pretty decent return on their $5m investment less than a year ago, which itself
was funded by the exercise of pre-IPO options.
But strangely enough, in
protesting that the offer by SABMiller was "wholly unsolicited and was
made without any prior discussions with the Board", the board omitted to
mention that the offer had just triggered a potential windfall from SABMiller
for 5 of the directors and the CFO of HB. If the put price is $110m, then the
payouts are:
| |
Advent stake |
Maximum
put value $m |
| Peter Lo |
27% |
29.7 |
| Li Wentao |
23% |
25.3 |
| Fu Hui |
19% |
20.9 |
| Peter Jeva Au |
18% |
19.8 |
| Bao Liusuo |
10% |
11.0 |
| Lam Pong Sui |
3% |
3.3 |
| Total |
100% |
110.0 |
A pay-out of $110m would imply a value per HB share of about
$9.41, which is extremely unlikely to be achieved in the current market, so they
would almost certainly exercise the put if they can. Even if the payout is $55m,
that would imply an HB price of $5.68, again far more than the already frothy
bid.
We call on HB to disclose full details of the put options, to
confirm whether or not they have become exercisable, as the wording of last
year's announcement suggests, at what exercise price, whether they have been
exercised by management, and whether the exercise is in any way subject to the
successful outcome of SABMiller's bid.
This story clearly isn't over, but we would not bet on a higher
offer from A-B, given the frothy price already on offer from SABMiller.
Depending on the detailed terms, management may also find it harder to collect
on their put option if they spurn SABMiller's offer. Even if Global Conduit
manages to complete the purchase from the Harbin Government, on balance we think
A-B's most likely move would be to accept the $4.30 on offer, which is about 4
times the book value of HB's net assets.
For once, the clear winners in all of this are the public
investors, who have seen a healthy return on the IPO price of $1.56. If you hold
the stock, with the market now at $4.90 (lunchtime 6-May-04) and a 2003 P/E of
41.8x, you would be well-advised to take your profits. Don't depend on the big
boys fighting it out.
© Webb-site.com, 2004
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site.com to a friend
Important notice: All material on this site, except
where otherwise accredited, is copyright to Webb-site.com.
Media and researchers are welcome to quote from articles on this site, provided that such
quotation is attributed to Webb-site.com. The
information in this site should not be relied upon by any person in making any investment
decision. No responsibility or liability is accepted by Webb-site.com or any person
related to it for any loss arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the
contents of this site. Persons who are in any doubt about an investment or potential
investment should take professional investment advice. From time to time parties associated with Webb-site.com may
own long or short positions in securities issued by or related to companies or governments
on which we comment.
Back to top
|