Woo, Kenneth Pui Ki 吳培基
Lou Siu Ping & Tam Sin Yee v Lam Tsz Man & Kenneth Woo Pui Ki
HK Court of Appeal, 20-Dec-2013
A small village house case in which the indigenous villager, after pre-selling the 2nd floor and roof to the plaintiffs, mortgaged the property, and it was foreclosed, leaving the buyers with no property. They sucessfully sued their lawyer, Kenneth Woo Pui Ki, for breach of duty of care, and his appeal is rejected. "Ding" houses cannot be sold by the indigenous villagers until 5 years after grant; this forward contract was less than 2 years after grant, but it is typical of the way in which villagers with a Y-chromosome from 1898 can monetise their dings.
HK Court of Appeal, 20-Dec-2013
A small village house case in which the indigenous villager, after pre-selling the 2nd floor and roof to the plaintiffs, mortgaged the property, and it was foreclosed, leaving the buyers with no property. They sucessfully sued their lawyer, Kenneth Woo Pui Ki, for breach of duty of care, and his appeal is rejected. "Ding" houses cannot be sold by the indigenous villagers until 5 years after grant; this forward contract was less than 2 years after grant, but it is typical of the way in which villagers with a Y-chromosome from 1898 can monetise their dings.
Lou Siu Ping & Tam Sin Yee v Lam Tsz Man & Kenneth Woo Pui Ki: costs
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Jul-2012
Costs in a case brought to the High Court which should have been brought to the District Court (involving under HK$1m) are awarded at the District Court level.
HK Court of First Instance, 17-Jul-2012
Costs in a case brought to the High Court which should have been brought to the District Court (involving under HK$1m) are awarded at the District Court level.
Lou Siu Ping & Tam Sin Yee v Lam Tsz Man & Kenneth Woo Pui Ki
HK Court of First Instance, 16-May-2012
HK Court of First Instance, 16-May-2012
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy