HK solicitors admitted overseas
This table analyses all solicitors admitted in HK and currently seen in the Law Society's Law List, whether practising or not. To which other jurisdictions they have been admitted, before or after being admitted to HK? Click a column heading to sort. Click a jurisdiction to see lawyers who have been admitted both there and in HK.
Some data are hidden to fit your display. Rotate?
Jurisdiction | Lawyers | Before HK |
On or after HK |
Share before |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | England & Wales | 3336 | 1308 | 2028 | 39.2% |
2 | New South Wales, Australia | 469 | 388 | 81 | 82.7% |
3 | New York, USA | 463 | 374 | 89 | 80.8% |
4 | Singapore | 300 | 125 | 175 | 41.7% |
5 | Victoria, Australia | 214 | 125 | 89 | 58.4% |
6 | New Zealand | 100 | 80 | 20 | 80.0% |
7 | China (People's Republic) | 80 | 67 | 13 | 83.8% |
8 | California, USA | 71 | 61 | 10 | 85.9% |
9 | Queensland, Australia | 70 | 53 | 17 | 75.7% |
10 | Ontario, Canada | 61 | 50 | 11 | 82.0% |
11 | Malaysia | 46 | 46 | 0 | 100.0% |
12 | British Columbia, Canada | 48 | 42 | 6 | 87.5% |
13 | West Australia, Australia | 37 | 35 | 2 | 94.6% |
14 | ACT, Australia | 163 | 32 | 131 | 19.6% |
15 | Scotland | 26 | 25 | 1 | 96.2% |
16 | District of Columbia, USA | 23 | 23 | 0 | 100.0% |
17 | South Australia, Australia | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% |
18 | Ireland | 23 | 15 | 8 | 65.2% |
19 | India | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
20 | New Jersey, USA | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
21 | Illinois, USA | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
22 | Massachusetts, USA | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
23 | Taiwan | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
24 | Washington, USA | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
25 | Alberta, Canada | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% |
26 | Germany | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
27 | France | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
28 | South Africa | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
29 | Bermuda | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
30 | Connecticut, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
31 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
32 | Texas, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
33 | Florida, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
34 | Hawaii, USA | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
35 | Israel | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
36 | Northern Ireland | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% |
37 | Pennsylvania, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
38 | Philippines | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
39 | Belgium | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
40 | British Virgin Islands | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
41 | Japan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
42 | Maryland, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
43 | Minnesota, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
44 | Missouri, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
45 | Ohio, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
46 | Quebec, Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
47 | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
48 | Tasmania, Australia | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
49 | Virginia, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
50 | Brunei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
51 | Colorado, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
52 | Georgia, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
53 | Indiana, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
54 | Kentucky, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
55 | Maine, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
56 | Marshall Islands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
57 | Michigan, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
58 | Nebraska, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
59 | Nepal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
60 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
61 | Nevada,USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
62 | North Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
63 | Northern Territory, Australia | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% |
64 | Oregon, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
65 | Pakistan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
66 | Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
67 | Russia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
68 | Saskatchewan, Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
69 | South Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
70 | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
71 | Wisconsin, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
72 | Alabama, USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
73 | Anguilla | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
74 | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
75 | Manitoba, Canada | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
76 | Nauru | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy