HK solicitors admitted overseas
This table analyses all solicitors admitted in HK and currently seen in the Law Society's Law List, whether practising or not. To which other jurisdictions they have been admitted, before or after being admitted to HK? Click a column heading to sort. Click a jurisdiction to see lawyers who have been admitted both there and in HK.
Some data are hidden to fit your display. Rotate?
Jurisdiction | Lawyers | Before HK |
On or after HK |
Share before |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Wisconsin, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
2 | West Australia, Australia | 37 | 35 | 2 | 94.6% |
3 | Washington, USA | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
4 | Virginia, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
5 | Victoria, Australia | 214 | 125 | 89 | 58.4% |
6 | Texas, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
7 | Tasmania, Australia | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
8 | Taiwan | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
9 | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
10 | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
11 | South Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
12 | South Australia, Australia | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% |
13 | South Africa | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
14 | Singapore | 300 | 125 | 175 | 41.7% |
15 | Scotland | 26 | 25 | 1 | 96.2% |
16 | Saskatchewan, Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
17 | Russia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
18 | Queensland, Australia | 71 | 54 | 17 | 76.1% |
19 | Quebec, Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
20 | Philippines | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
21 | Pennsylvania, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
22 | Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
23 | Pakistan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
24 | Oregon, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
25 | Ontario, Canada | 62 | 50 | 12 | 80.6% |
26 | Ohio, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
27 | Northern Territory, Australia | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% |
28 | Northern Ireland | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% |
29 | North Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
30 | New Zealand | 100 | 80 | 20 | 80.0% |
31 | New York, USA | 463 | 374 | 89 | 80.8% |
32 | New South Wales, Australia | 469 | 388 | 81 | 82.7% |
33 | New Jersey, USA | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
34 | Nevada,USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
35 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
36 | Nepal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
37 | Nebraska, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
38 | Nauru | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
39 | Missouri, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
40 | Minnesota, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
41 | Michigan, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
42 | Massachusetts, USA | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
43 | Maryland, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
44 | Marshall Islands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
45 | Manitoba, Canada | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
46 | Malaysia | 46 | 46 | 0 | 100.0% |
47 | Maine, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
48 | Kentucky, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
49 | Japan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
50 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
51 | Israel | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
52 | Ireland | 23 | 15 | 8 | 65.2% |
53 | Indiana, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
54 | India | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
55 | Illinois, USA | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
56 | Hawaii, USA | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
57 | Germany | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
58 | Georgia, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
59 | France | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
60 | Florida, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
61 | England & Wales | 3339 | 1307 | 2032 | 39.1% |
62 | District of Columbia, USA | 23 | 23 | 0 | 100.0% |
63 | Connecticut, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
64 | Colorado, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
65 | China (People's Republic) | 79 | 66 | 13 | 83.5% |
66 | California, USA | 71 | 61 | 10 | 85.9% |
67 | Brunei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
68 | British Virgin Islands | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
69 | British Columbia, Canada | 49 | 42 | 7 | 85.7% |
70 | Bermuda | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
71 | Belgium | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
72 | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
73 | Anguilla | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
74 | Alberta, Canada | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% |
75 | Alabama, USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
76 | ACT, Australia | 163 | 32 | 131 | 19.6% |
Sign up for our free newsletter
Recommend Webb-site to a friend
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy