APPLE DAILY LIMITED 蘋果日報有限公司

Henry Chan Hin Keung v Apple Daily Ltd & others: costs
HK District Court, 1-Apr-2019
The newspaper wins its costs in the unsuccessful defamation action against it.
Henry Chan Hin Keung v Apple Daily Ltd & others
HK District Court, 22-Mar-2018
Chim Pui Chung v Apple Daily Ltd & othersMartingale (betting system)
HK Court of First Instance, 3-Feb-2017
Mr Chim wins HK$100k for an article criticising his claim of a winning formula for betting on the 2014 soccer World Cup. No evidence was advanced in defence to show that he was wrong. Mathematicians would recognise his claim to be a Martingale system. Even with no house-edge, the net expected value of the series of bets is zero-win, because although there would be a small net win on most series, there is also a small risk of a huge loss. In reality, no punter has unlimited capital, no house accepts infinite bets, each series of matches comes to an end and every house takes an edge.
Chim Pui Chung v Apple Daily Ltd & others
HK Court of First Instance, 19-Apr-2016
University of HK v HK Commercial Broadcasting & another
HK Court of First Instance, 30-Nov-2015
OPG Human Resources Ltd v Apple Daily Ltd
HK Court of First Instance, 24-Jan-2011
Apple Daily Ltd v Oriental Press Group Ltd & others
HK Court of First Instance, 3-Jan-2011

Sign up for our free newsletter

Recommend Webb-site to a friend

Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy

Back to top